A theorem of Mazur-Ulam on isometric maps of vector spaces November 22, 2009
Posted by Akhil Mathew in analysis, functional analysis, MaBloWriMo.Tags: isometries, linear maps
add a comment
I first posted this entry at Climbing Mount Bourbaki, where I have continued the MaBloWriMo series into topics in Riemannian geometry such as the Cartan-Hadamard theorem. This particular material came up as part of the proof that distance-preserving maps between Riemannian manifolds are actually isometries. However, the style of the entry seemed appropriate for this blog, so I’m placing it here as well.
The result in question is:
Theorem 1 (Mazur-Ulam) An isometry
of a normed linear space
onto another normed linear space
with
is linear. (more…)
My new math blog: Climbing Mount Bourbaki November 16, 2009
Posted by Akhil Mathew in General.Tags: shameless plugs
2 comments
I started a new mathematics blog at Climbing Mount Bourbaki.
Ultimately, as Steven observed in the comments yesterday, textbook-flavored posts–that is to say, those belonging to a long series on a given topic, aren’t quite what this blog is about. In fact, I don’t think there has been much about “Mathematical research and problem-solving” as of late. That said, I like doing such posts, and it helps me learn mathematics. That’s why I started this new blath.
So, what do I plan to do here? Of course, I’m still a contributor, though I probably will be less active than once-a-day. I’m much less familiar with contest math-style problem-solving as some of the other contributors here. At some point I will talk about my RSI project, but I’m still busy working on it. Instead, I’ll probably aim to write more crisp, article-like posts that tell an interesting story without needing a whole series. Those will appear here and on Climbing Mount Bourbaki. The Bourbakist ones will be relegated to there.
Hopf-Rinow II and an application November 15, 2009
Posted by Akhil Mathew in differential geometry, MaBloWriMo.Tags: geodesic completeness, geodesics, homotopy, Hopf-Rinow theorem, Riemannian manifolds
2 comments
Now, let’s finish the proof of the Hopf-Rinow theorem (the first one) started yesterday. We need to show that given a Riemannian manifold which is a metric space
, the existence of arbitrary geodesics from
implies that
is complete with respect to
. Actually, this is slightly stronger than what H-R states: geodesic completeness at one point
implies completeness.
The first thing to notice is that is smooth by the global smoothness theorem and the assumption that arbitrary geodesics from
exist. Moreover, it is surjective by the second Hopf-Rinow theorem.
Now fix a -Cauchy sequence
. We will show that it converges. Draw minimal geodesics
travelling at unit speed with
The Hopf-Rinow theorems and geodesic completeness November 14, 2009
Posted by Akhil Mathew in differential geometry, MaBloWriMo.Tags: completeness, geodesic completeness, geodesics, Hopf-Rinow theorem, Riemannian manifolds
10 comments
Ok, yesterday I covered the basic fact that given a Riemannian manifold , the geodesics on
(with respect to the Levi-Civita connection) locally minimize length. Today I will talk about the phenomenon of “geodesic completeness.”
Henceforth, all manifolds are assumed connected.
The first basic remark to make is the following. If is a piecewise
-path between
and has the smallest length among piecewise
paths, then
is, up to reparametrization, a geodesic (in particular smooth). The way to see this is to pick
very close to each other, so that
is contained in a neighborhood of
satisfying the conditions of yesterday’s theorem; then
must be length-minimizing, so it is a geodesic. We thus see that
is locally a geodesic, hence globally.
Say that is geodesically complete if
can be defined on all of
; in other words, a geodesic
can be continued to
. The name is justified by the following theorem:
Theorem 1 (Hopf-Rinow)
The following are equivalent:
is geodesically complete.
- In the metric
on
induced by
(see here),
is a complete metric space (more…)
Geodesics are locally length-minimizing November 13, 2009
Posted by Akhil Mathew in differential geometry, MaBloWriMo.Tags: Gauss lemma, geodesics, Riemannian manifolds
add a comment
Fix a Riemannian manifold with metric and Levi-Civita connection
. Then we can talk about geodesics on
with respect to
. We can also talk about the length of a piecewise smooth curve
as
Our main goal today is:
Theorem 1 Given
, there is a neighborhood
containing
such that geodesics from
to every point of
exist and also such that given a path
inside
from
to
, we have
![]()
with equality holding if and only if
is a reparametrization of
.
In other words, geodesics are locally path-minimizing. Not necessarily globally–a great circle is a geodesic on a sphere with the Riemannian metric coming from the embedding in , but it need not be the shortest path between two points. (more…)
The test case: flat Riemannian manifolds November 12, 2009
Posted by Akhil Mathew in differential geometry, MaBloWriMo.Tags: curvature tensor, flat manifolds, Riemannian metrics, test case
1 comment so far
Recall that two Riemannian manifolds are isometric if there exists a diffeomorphism
that preserves the metric on the tangent spaces. The curvature tensor (associated to the Levi-Civita connection) measures the deviation from flatness, where a manifold is flat if it is locally isometric to a neighborhood of
.
Theorem 1 (The Test Case) The Riemannian manifold
is locally isometric to
if and only if the curvature tensor vanishes. (more…)
Identities for the curvature tensor November 11, 2009
Posted by Akhil Mathew in differential geometry, MaBloWriMo.Tags: Bianchi identity, connections, curvature tensor, eponymy, Riemannian metrics
add a comment
It turns out that the curvature tensor associated to the connection from a Riemannian pseudo-metric has to satisfy certain conditions. (As usual, we denote by
the Levi-Civita connection associated to
, and we assume the ground manifold is smooth.)
First of all, we have skew-symmetry
This is immediate from the definition.
Next, we have another variant of skew-symmetry:
Proposition 1
(more…)
The fundamental theorem of Riemannian geometry and the Levi-Civita connection November 10, 2009
Posted by Akhil Mathew in differential geometry, MaBloWriMo.Tags: connections, Levi-Civita connection, Riemannian metrics
8 comments
Ok, now onto the Levi-Civita connection. Fix a manifold with the pseudo-metric
. This means essentially a metric, except that
as a bilinear form on the tangent spaces is still symmetric and nondegenerate but not necessarily positive definite. It is still possible to say that a pseudo-metric is compatible with a given connection.
This is the fundamental theorem of Riemannian geometry:
Theorem 1 There is a unique symmetric connection on
compatible with
. (more…)
The Riemann curvature tensor November 9, 2009
Posted by Akhil Mathew in differential geometry, MaBloWriMo.Tags: connections, curvature tensor
3 comments
Today I will discuss the Riemann curvature tensor. This is the other main invariant of a connection, along with the torsion. It turns out that on Riemannian manifolds with their canonical connections, this has a nice geometric interpretation that shows that it generalizes the curvature of a surface in space, which was defined and studied by Gauss. When , a Riemannian manifold is flat, i.e. locally isometric to Euclidean space.
Rather amusingly, the notion of a tensor hadn’t been formulated when Riemann discovered the curvature tensor.
Given a connection on the manifold
, define the curvature tensor
by
There is some checking to be done to show that is linear over the ring of smooth functions on
, but this is a straightforward computation, and since it has already been done in detail here, I will omit the proof.
The main result I want to show today is the following:
Proposition 1
Letbe a manifold with a connection
whose curvature tensor vanishes. Then if
is a surface with
open and
a vector field along
, then
(more…)
Symmetric connections, corrected version November 9, 2009
Posted by Akhil Mathew in differential geometry, MaBloWriMo.Tags: connections, corrections, symmetric connections, torsion tensor
add a comment
My post yesterday on the torsion tensor and symmetry had a serious error. For some reason I thought that connections can be pulled back. I am correcting the latter part of that post (where I used that erroneous claim) here. I decided not to repeat the (as far as I know) correct earlier part.
Proposition 1 Let
be a surface in
, and let
be a symmetric connection on
. Then
(more…)